.svg){kind=small}
It’s 8 PM on a Friday. You’ve just attached "Master_Services_Agreement_Final_Final_v7_JDs_edits_USE_THIS_ONE.docx" to an email, hoping (more like praying) this is the last time you’ll see it.
We’ve all been there. That chaotic, email-driven dance of redlines, Slack messages, and version control feels like a rite of passage for any legal or commercial team at a growing company. I’ve navigated my fair share of it, particularly in high-growth, private equity, and venture-backed environments where speed is everything, but the infrastructure hasn't necessarily kept up.
But here’s the realization I’ve come to after implementing contract systems and optimizing legal operations across multiple organizations: that chaos isn’t a rite of passage. It’s a strategic roadblock. From what I'm seeing, the systems that got us here are often the very things preventing us from getting to the next level of growth.
It's Not a Workflow Problem, It's a Growth Problem
When a company scales, the volume and complexity of its contracts grow exponentially. The manual, ad-hoc processes that worked for a 20-person startup (typically a shared drive, a few Word templates, and a lot of hustle) begin to buckle under the weight of a 200-person mid-market enterprise.
I’ve seen this pattern repeatedly. In a recent role at a rapidly scaling SaaS company, we faced exactly this challenge. The existing infrastructure simply couldn't support the volume, which involved renewing over a thousand existing customers onto better terms while also closing new business and integrating strategic acquisitions.
The resulting friction isn't a sign of a failing team; it's a sign of a system that hasn't kept pace with the business's ambition. Chasing approvals, hunting for the latest version of a document, and manually tracking obligations aren't just daily frustrations. They are symptoms of a deeper issue.
To put it plainly: You can't build a skyscraper on the foundation of a single-family home, and you cannot scale a modern business on a foundation of copy-paste and email.
This isn't just about making the legal team’s life easier; it's about building an operational infrastructure that supports, rather than hinders, the company's trajectory.
The Hidden "Agility Tax" on Your Business
While the legal team often feels the pain of a fragmented contract process most acutely, the true cost is borne by the entire organization. A slow, opaque, and unpredictable contract process acts as a hidden "agility tax" on every strategic move the business makes.
The consequences are staggering when you look at the data. Inefficient contract management leads to revenue leakage, in fact companies lose an average of 9.2% of annual revenue due to poor contract management practices. That isn't just a rounding error; it's a significant financial drain hiding in plain sight.
This financial leakage is compounded by operational drag. Consider that a simple, low-risk agreement can cost nearly thousands of dollars to process manually. And perhaps most alarming, 70% of companies can't even locate 10% or more of their own contracts. I’ve personally managed the challenge of ingesting thousands of legacy documents into a centralized system; when contracts are scattered across email and local drives, the compliance and revenue risk is immense.
This tax on agility creates a ripple effect that impacts every department:
- For Sales, it's the deal that stalls at the one-yard line. The team works hard to secure a verbal "yes," only for the deal to enter weeks of legal limbo. This frustrates the customer, delays revenue, and puts the quarter's forecast at risk.
- For Finance, it's the inability to forecast accurately. When deal closures are unpredictable, so is revenue recognition. This makes strategic planning, budgeting, and cash flow management a high-stakes guessing game.
- For Operations and Procurement, it's a systemic bottleneck. Onboarding a critical new vendor or launching a strategic partnership is delayed - not by complex negotiation points, but by the logistical nightmare of getting the right document in front of the right people in the right order.
In many organizations, the contract approval workflow resembles a broken relay race. The baton is constantly being dropped between departments, or runners aren't sure who to pass it to next. A modern, systemized approach provides a clearly marked track with seamless, automated handoffs, ensuring the baton never hits the ground.
From Gatekeeper to Deal Accelerator
The alternative to this chaos is not about working harder, faster, or hiring more people to manage the spreadsheets. It's about fundamentally rethinking the role of the legal function and empowering it with the right infrastructure.
Throughout my career, whether I was building a custom contract management system in Jira or implementing enterprise solutions, the goal was always the same: to shift the legal team’s role from a necessary gatekeeper to a strategic deal accelerator.
Imagine a world where business teams can self-serve routine agreements, like NDAs, from a library of pre-approved, up-to-date templates. A world where Sales can generate a standard MSA that is already aligned with finance's billing requirements and legal's risk profile, without waiting days for an initial review.
When this happens, the legal team can dedicate its valuable and limited time to what it does best: navigating high-stakes negotiations, managing M&A activity, and advising on complex strategic risks (like the nuances of new AI regulations or complex data privacy requirements), helping the business move faster, safely.
Contracts are the central nervous system of a business. They encode the rules for every critical relationship. When that system is fragmented, the business is slow and uncoordinated. When it is centralized, intelligent, and automated, the business can react with the speed and precision needed to win.
Systemize with CLM to Scale
The endless cycle of chasing signatures and reconciling conflicting document versions is more than just an annoyance, it's a critical indicator that your company's operational engine is struggling to keep up with its growth.
Continuing to rely on manual processes for a function as fundamental as contracting is not a sustainable strategy. It exposes the business to unnecessary financial loss, slows down revenue, and introduces significant compliance risk. To truly scale, we must move from ad-hoc processes to intentional systems.
The first step is recognizing the scale of the problem. The next is understanding the solution. In a follow-up post, we’ll break down the key capabilities to look for when evaluating a modern contract lifecycle management system.
